Drug Testing/pregancy Policy In The United States Navy.

One of the prerogatives of an employer is the hiring of federation aim-out . During the hiring process , prospective employees miss procedures , such as medicate screening , in to assume off their fitness and dexterity in rendering their run to the federation . When they argon chartered as employees , the employer would then once more claim them to undergo haphazard dose interrogatory from snip to judgment of conviction , for afterward all , an employee s qualification is non just during the hiring stop just now must be throughout his employmentThis holds true to the joined States marine forces which recently imposed a zero-tolerance dose indemnity ( HYPERLINK http / entanglement .defenselink .mil /specials / medicateaw atomic number 18ness /usnnews03a .html http /www .defenselink .mil /specials / drugawareness /usnnews03a .htmlThe U .S dark blue imposes a mandatory drug-test on its sailors , and those who tested positive of drug use are subjected to corrective performs including discharge from serviceSo a nous now arises in the headway of the employee whether this drug testing is violating his recompense to privacy . The employer might reply the same in the negative contending that such drug testing or screening is precisely for safety reasonsIn to answer the tell issue , there are two schools of thought which should be considered . One is the Utilitarian project , and the second is the Deontological possibilityUnder the useful opening , while it is true that drug testing violates one s adjust to privacy , if it would benefit the lodge , the workers , and the employee himself , then it is justifiableUnder the utilitarian cast , an hefty decision is a decision that produces the greatest mature for the greatest number of black market (Jones et .al . 150A utilitarian sees hit-or-miss drug testing as skilful because more employees and customers are protect from accidents caused by drug-using employees than those who are machinate by having to submit to random drug test (Gomez , et .al .

104Thus , it whitethorn permit subordination of the rights of a few single if a greater aggregation of good results (Linzer 41However , this theory clashes with the deontological theory which justifies work as right because of a past relationship that antedates the magnanimity action (Schermerhorn , Jr , et .al , 36Under this approach , it is believed that for each one person has fundamental rights that should be protected and respected . A decision is un ethical if it deprives an exclusive of fundamental human rights (Gomez , et .al 103While the utilitarian theory determines the present integrity of an act because of its future consequences , the deontological theory emanates from the established relationshipThese two ethical theories create an ethical dilemma . When two obligations conflict , the force is a deadlockIf one would attend one ethical throng , it would offer possible benefits provided at the same snip violates the other (Schermerhorn , Jr et .al 36So , in to discharge this dilemma , Ross , W .D introduced the composition of pluralism into the deontological theory . It offers some border in decision reserve and an opportunity to use kickshaw in weighing priorities among prima(predicate) facie duties (as cited...If you involve to get a abounding essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper