Nature and Nurture in Frankenstein

Mencius, a prize philosopher in ancient mainland China has one time said, mans nature at consume is impregnable. Rousseau is a well-known cut philosopher of the 18th century who has once states in his theory on the natural man that one is born free and good further is corrupted by society. Ones personality, therefore, is decided by kindle, or the environs which they cause grown up with. This idea is also proven throughout in bloody shame Shelleys novel Frankenstein-Shelley uses flocks rejection and the putzs failure to fit in the society to show that nurture is the leading factor which affects the defining of the savages despicable character.\nIn the novel, the pecker starts his heart fresh and innocently alike to a newborn. He chuck berries, drinks from the brook, sleeps under shades undecomposed like an animal(Shelley 84). He is ramshackle by his own reason Victor from the moment he is brought to life, thus, the creature has never been taught how to be a huma n being. When the creature shows up in public, bulk panic, Some fled, some attacked me, until, grievously bruised by stones and many opposite kinds of missile weapons, I fly to the open country.(Shelly 87). The creature does not fight back, proving his innocence, purity, and good intentions. The creature then hides in a hovel, where he learns how to speak, read, and write from the De Lacey family who lives in the cottage right following(a) to his hovel (Shelley Chapter 13). Being travel by the gentle ingenuity of the De Lacey family, the creature longs to join them but dares not (Shelley 91). After realizing their poverty, the creature starts doing good deeds that he thinks would help those people whom he admires-he stops stealing food from them once it becomes aware to him that in doing this inflicted pain on the cottagers, collects timberland in order to suffice their labour (Shelley 92). If the creature were really born a monster, it is in truth unlikely that he would hav e any capacity ...