.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Comparison of 3 Stocks :: essays papers

Comparison of 3 Stocks All my stock market choices are engine room based. nVIDIA is a producer of video card software, AMD a provider of motherboard processors and electronic Arts a videogame publisher.nVIDIA is an example of a decreasing-cost industry. While a sooner early new comer to the video card industry, nVIDIA was showing potency from the start. Major competition to nVIDIAs foothold in the industry include 3dfxs voodoo technology and ATIs Rage. Although 3dfxs foothold seemed unmovable, the succeeding(a) wave of technology to spread out brought about their eventual downf all in the market. 3dfxs lack of support for their next generation video card game (the voodoo4 & voodoo5) resulted in their being bought out by the nVIDIA Corporation. While nVIDIA released patches to over geminate the performance of the GeForce2s technology, 3dfxs patches for the Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 were riddled with flaws, resulting in performance issues for all of their customers. After the b uyout, nVIDIA were now free to utilize the voodoo technology and go past in the market. Now ready to explode even bigger than before, entrust be the arrival of the GeForce3 boasting results over ten fold that of previous(prenominal) video cards, the GeForce3 will have unparallel performance in the market. This is detect by the slow increase in the percent gain, which will rise dramatically with the release of their new board.AMD, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., was a fraternity entering a seemingly unbreakable market. Processor technology with a high initial cost categorizes it as a decreasing-cost industry. AMD, now the most(prenominal) popular provider of processor technology, came in against the multi-billion dollar corporation of Microsoft. Microsofts Pentium processor currently held a foothold in the market however, AMDs cheaper K-6 series (although not as powerful processor) provided an economical selection to Microsofts more(prenominal) powerful Pentium II processor. Wi th sales being lost to the more economical K6 series, Microsoft released the Celeron processor, which was widely accepted as a poor alternative to AMDs K6. However, customer familiarity with the Microsoft brand name, allowed for Microsoft to recoup some of its losses in the field, but with AMDs following rising, the K7 (Athlon) processor, took a firm hold in the field against the Pentium III. Furthermore, the Athlon Thunderbird (the successor to the K7) has now taken a majority mesh of the market, by outperforming the Pentium IV in most performance tests.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.