Monday, March 11, 2019

Accounting: the Forensic Accounting Who Fought Whiet Collar Crime Essay

Abstr propelThe global increase in postiche has caused some(prenominal) people to lose charge in accountants. However, experts in the field of rhetorical Accounting, much(prenominal) as testify dodge Examiners, argon restoring ethics and religion by fighting to deter white-collar crimes. The close to predominate character of skulker encountered is business concernal phony. Under occupational fraud the around common and consequential schemes be asset misappropriation and two-faced statements. Due to the speedy increase of occupational fraud, governments have implemented anti-fraud controls. Statistics have shown that these controls have helped to simplification the likelihood of fraud. This trial runination of forensic Accounting points out the importance of certifiable pseudo Examiners in the economic, business, and fiscal fields within the International Community. assimilate moreMasters of Satire John Dryden and Jonathan Swift Essayforensic Accounting Fighting White Collar CrimeWhen asked more or less estimable issues in the field of be, Raymond Reisig, both a qualified Public restrainer (CPA) and Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), stated that ethics is the compriseation which account stands on because Our whole profession depends on people trusting us. However, ascribable to the drop of ethics in umteen large companies involved with fraud, the state-supported has lost faith in the story profession. Hoping to restore the trust of society, many companies worldwide have incorporated Forensic Accounting into their industries. Essentially, the secret to breakthrough fraud is by following a trail of money that volition eventually lead to evidence that proves where the money has gone. This has been the theorize of Certified Fraud Examiners for years. A number of different types of frauds occur daily, but the most prevalent type of fraud that seems to catch the publics eye is occupational fraud. E realday, Certified Fraud Examiners are working profound to fight mangle occupational fraud in corporate America.According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), occupational fraud is the use of ones occupation for personal enrichment through the deliberate misuse or misapplication of the employing organizations resources or assets (2010, p. 6). Occupational fraud has now become a global problem, which has substantially increased the demand for forensic accounting. Forensic accounting is one of the many kickoffes in accounting to a lower place this specific branch exists Certified Fraud Examiners. Certified Fraud Examiners are experts specifically happy to find fraud, detect the ways in which the fraud was committed, and uncover who may have committed the crime. Two of the many schemes under occupational fraud that certified fraud examiners are confronted with are asset misappropriation and fraudulent statements. Report to the Nations, a worldwide memorize of 1,843 cases of occupational fraud from 2008-2009, name that in the U.S. plus misappropriation schemes were the most common form of fraud representing 90% of all cases (ACFE, 2010, p. 4).Asset misappropriations range from conspiracies like skimming, when an employee does not demo a sale and instead pockets the money, to schemes like check tampering, when an employee steals blank checks from the follow and writes them out to himself. However, the most common fraud is billing. Billing happens when an employee deceives his employer to make dishonorable payments by submitting invoices for fictitious goods or services. One manikin of this could be found in a novel report in The New York Times. Anita Collins, 67, who is being charged for grand larceny in the first degree, for embezzling over $ 1 one one million million million over seven years from the Archdiocese of New York. Anita was able to skilfully delude the Catholic Church by sending fictitious invoices to the Archdiocese and takings 468 checks to accou nts she controlled (Otterman 2010).Billing alone dissolve cause an organization to lose, on average, $128,000 annually. Although Asset misappropriation is the most common type of fraud, according to Report to The Nations it is the to the lowest degree costly. In contrast to asset misappropriation, fraudulent statements besides made up less than 5% of all cases in the same study. However, these schemes are the most consequential, causing a median loss of more than $4 million annually (ACFE 4). Fraudulent statements involve the manipulation, falsification or alteration of accounting records, misrepresentation of financial statements, and the misapplication of accounting principles relating to amounts (Crumbley 2009). Financial statement schemes can be very hard to catch because they are buried under false numbers and fake company names. In a recent New York Times article authors Hiroko Tabuchi and Keith Bradsher revealed that in October 2011, Michael C. Woodford, former Olympus pr esident and party boss executive, exposed the corporations fraudulent accounting.The scandal cover up $1.7 billion in losings by misstating their finances on their income statements. The corporations former and current executives tactically buried their losses so that external auditors could never discover them (Tabuchi 2012). Due to the complexity of financial statement fraud, such as the Olympus scandal, many companies hire certified fraud examiners to investigate their financial statements when they suspect fraud is present. Occupational fraud is hard to detect due to the fact that owners and executives commit most fraud. Take for example the case of Maria do Rosario Veiga. Ms. Veiga was an experienced auditor who had been working for the land Meteorological Organization for 4 years before she blew the whistle on their fraudulent behavior. Ms. Veiga was fired from the organization because she refused to cover- up an embezzlement scheme of 3.5 million dollars stolen by senior of ficials (WMO 2009).For this reason many organizations have implemented anti-fraud controls to hold back and detect fraud. Anti- fraud controls consist of controls such as hotlines, fraud dressing for employees, surprise audits and employee support programs. In every study since 2002, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners have found that tips are the most common and powerful way to detect fraud (ACFE 4). This study found that tips detected 40.2 per centum of all cases employees were the most common source of fraud tips (ACFE 17). Anti- fraud controls are reinforcing honest standards in the field of accounting. A specific case study examined by CFE Tracy Coenen exemplifies the right way to tell apart with receiving a tip from an employee about fraud. First, the board of directors must determine that an independent investigation of the allegations should be done. aft(prenominal) this, they seek unbiased analysis, and retain an outside counsel and a forensic accountant to investigate.Management then gathers all documents relevant to the allegations, and gives the investigator introduction to all employees and accounting records (Coenen 2011). Going through such procedures should be significant to any company who receives a suspicious tip from an employee. Due to the major(ip) business scandals involving asset misappropriation and fraudulent statements, it is crucial for CFEs to have a good understanding of these schemes. Examining fraud involves close examination and piecing together financial evidence to find the hidden truth behind numbers. For this reason, the requirements to become a CFE include earning a Bachelors Degree, passing a ten-hour exam and having at least two years of professional experience in the related field (Meservy, 2006, p. 164). Not hardly do these requirements prepare a CFE before going into the field of forensic accounting, but they also turn back the public that the work of a CFE is trustworthy.Although it is very import ant that CFEs obtain acquaintance of fraudulent behavior, it is also important that they acquire other skills as well. umteen times when people hear the word accountant they rarely debate of a person who has excellent conversation and piece of music skills. However, this is a very misleading misconception In fact in a survey of 725 CFEs, communication and people skills were reported as critical by 44% of the recipients (Meservey, 2006, p. 176). These skills are viewed as critical because when a fraud examiner is investigating a case, he or she must be able to speak at a time with their client A CFE must also be able to orally present their findings in a courtroom to a judge and venire in a way that is clear and easy to understand (Wells, 2009). on with communication and people skills, surprisingly, writing skills are also one of the most important.After a fraud examiner collects all the evidence needed, he or she must report their findings A majority of the time these findi ngs are reported by writing. Tracy Coenen, a fraud examiner and forensic accountant, stresses that, The better financial expert witnesses help win cases by artfully and patently communicating the facts through written reports (Coenen, 2007). For this reason, a CFE must have loyal writing skills. A part of effectively reporting facts is following an honest code by re importanting unbiased about the innocence or guilt of the suspect, and reporting only relevant facts. If there is a lack of clarity in the way facts are reported and communicated, not only can it cause the jury to lose trust in the CFEs findings, but essentially cause a negative outcome on a case (Coenen, 2007).The corner stone of the accounting field is ethics. For this reason, being ethical is the most important skill a CFE should acquire. Huge fraud cases such as the collapse of Enron and WorldCom led to higher costs for products and services, mistrust in leaders and a loss in retirement funds and job security (C rumbley, 2009). This was one of the driving forces that led to the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This act not only regulated the auditing profession but it also demonstrate to the public that accountants value ethical standards.Up until now this act is found on making everyone responsible for fighting fraud by flip-flop magnitude all parties responsibilities for uncovering such fraud in every counsellor at every stop in the process (Crumbley 2009). Not only has the Sarbanes-Oxley Act helped to gain the trust of the public, but CFEs have also vie a huge role in this as well. The fact that the main task of a CFE is to deter and detect fraud, proves to society that the field of accounting remains ethical and fair. Fraud has caused many people to lose their trust in accountants however, the field of accounting is implementing many ways to reduce fraud.Forensic Accounting plays a huge role in this because Certified Fraud Examiners are being used to analyze and examine financial statements in a way that normal accountants cannot. Through excellent communication and writing skills CFEs have ultimately proven that accountants do more than just deal with numbers. The increase in demand for Forensic Accounting shows that our ethical standards are still our main priority. Unfortunately, occupational fraud is something that always occurs in every organization we cannot change this. However, what forensic accounting can change is the way which society views accountants as ethical.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.